I’m going to Arizona on Friday to talk about Alternative Valuation Products.
What are Alternative Valuation Products? In a nutshell, the term is used to describe any product that provides a valuation to a lender, but is not intended to meet the guidelines or format of Fannie and Freddie. In other words-anything besides a 1004.
Ah yes-the venerable 1004. One of the most difficult challenges facing residential appraisers is that they have been forced down the cattle chute of conformity in what type of report they provide to clients. Maybe I’m making this statistic up-but I think that 93.675% of all residential appraisers provide a 1004 appraisal to any client-regardless of the intended use and the intended user. Lenders, lawyers, consumers-it’s always a 1004.
Does that make sense? Is the 1004 the all-purpose appraisal report format? I think not. The 1004 is intended for the needs of Freddie and Fannie. It meets their internal needs, their requirements. It’s not the all-purpose appraisal; but it is the default format for residential appraisals.
I have spoken to thousands of appraisers over the last several years. When I talk about the 1004 or forms in general – I mention that I think that forms have been the ruination of an industry; That residential appraisers have been pushed down a path that makes them really good form-fillers, but often stifles their skills at producing an appraisal. We have been focused far too long on the presentation layer – the report. We have been lead to believe that the report is the appraisal. We have lost sight (some of us at least) that it is the analysis, the process of determining the valuation of a given property that is our job. The form is merely the outcome of our appraisal findings. Form vendors have worked hard to make the form as efficient as possible and they have done a good job.
But at what cost? There are times when I am amazed that so many in our industry look to the 1004 and lament about appraisal fees that are dropping; that volume is down and that the industry is on the ropes.
But not all volumes are down. Last year, by some estimates, more than 12 million valuation products were completed by someone other than an appraiser. Say what? Exactly! These were alternative products that appraisers did not provide to their clients. These were products that for the most part could have been performed by appraisers. This is the alternative valuation product marketplace. Over a billion dollars is spent on these products. This is a billion dollars that could go into your pockets.
What are these products used for?
Here is the feedback from a top-ten lender on how they would like to use alternative valuation products:
- As a replacement for BPOs in the valuation hierarchy for home equity origination.
- An alternative to a URAR in non-agency (GSE) or portfolio loans (home equity, private client, consumer finance, community banking).
- In default management as a replacement for one or all of the BPOs used throughout the process.
- A replacement or alternative for current valuations in the loan modification programs.
- Use in quality assurance programs to meet agency requirements.
- As a second valuation for value dispute resolution and value reconciliation purposes.
I can already hear what you are saying beneath your breath. “The fees are too low.” “I can’t do those appraisals because I cannot meet USPAP requirements and provide that kind of report.” And worst of all-“these types of reports are destroying our industry.”
Nonsense.
My message is simple: alternative valuation products are needed by our clients, and they want appraisers to perform them. Others have seen the need (notably BPOs) and have provided them to their clients for years.
Others are just beginning to smell the roses.
On Monday, I spoke with Joanna Conde, the organizer of the Arizona State Conference: http://www.arizonaappraisersstateconference.org. She told me that my discussion of alternative valuation products was the “hot” topic. She said that half the people would love what I have to say and half would hate the message. I have the opportunity to change some hearts and minds.
Challenge accepted.
I have recognized that there are some appraisers who believe that anything less than a 1004 is a violation of USPAP; that it is somehow “less” of an appraisal. I am here to tell you that those appraisers are wrong. Chief appraisers of the nation’s largest lenders agree; AMCs agree; USPAP instructors agree. Appraisers can provide a solution that meets their clients’ needs. They can do it in a manner consistent with the requirements of USPAP, and they can do it in a manner that makes money for the appraiser. And I am talking serious money by the way. I keep hearing this canard that somehow by performing any report that is less than the going rate for a 1004 will cause appraisers to work for less. Hello! Can we focus on your hourly rate rather than your “piece-work” pricing? If an appraiser can consistently make $50 an hour, are they not making $100,000 a year? Am I missing something here? Or is it more likely that those who shriek the loudest are missing it?
Last week I attended the Collateral Risk Network (CRN) www.collateralrisknetwork.com conference in New Orleans. What was identified as a critical need by most of the speakers? Answer: The need for appraisers to perform alternative valuations for their clients. One after another, some of the nation’s largest lenders came to the front and asked what could be done so that appraisers could provide products outside of the traditional sphere of the 1004.
I heard the same message from the Industry Advisory Council of the Appraisal Foundation some months back. The members went so far as to establish a task force to provide guidance to appraisers on how they could provide USPAP conforming alternative products to their clients.
There will be whole new opportunities emerging in the next few years to empower appraisers. And there will be new tools and new analytics that will make the appraiser’s job both exciting and more remunerative. I really believe that.
And by the way-it’s not about wrapping an AVM inside of a product and saying it’s an appraisal. I’ve seen those and I yawn. It about a whole new class of product that takes advantage of data and provides the tools to analyze the data. More about that in future blogs.
For now-it’s about the Arizona Appraiser’s State Conference. I am sure that some of the people coming to the Arizona conference will challenge whether appraisers can provide this type of product. They will challenge me and some will likely suggest (or shout) that appraisers cannot provide an alternative valuation product.
I accept the challenge.
As appraisers, we provide services to our clients. We need to provide the right product for the identified client need. We can offer far more than a 1004.
All and all, in these groups I see an air of hope. That maybe the opportunity still remains for appraisers to provide an expanded array of products that will meet client needs. There is also a feeling that maybe this is the right time-the tipping point. But many still question whether appraisers can come up with a solution that meets those client needs and whether they will step up and perform anything other than a 1004.
I think they will.
I have been pitching alternative valuation products for years. Products that can offer more credible and supportable values with greater transparency.
So Friday and Saturday I will have in excess of 300 appraisers who will run the gamut of “I love the idea” to “I hate the idea.”
Bring them on.
If you are one of the 4,500 appraisers in shooting distance to Phoenix – come hear me speak on Friday or Saturday. Check out the link and the agenda and sign up. It’s cheap for what you will get. Tell me what you think. I’m open to the good, the bad and the ugly. Ask your tough questions.
I don’t think appraisers are one-trick-ponies. I think we have a lot to offer-and our time to shine is coming back.
Let me know what you think.
RSS Feed
Posted in 

Mark, this sounds like a great direction for the future of our industry. Count me as VERY interested! One question, what’s the difference between the newer forms that you are suggesting and when the 2000 series was implemented?
Mark,
Outstanding article of awareness that has been needed for our industry for sometime now. We real estate appraiser’s must change our mindset to stay competitive in the ever changing world of real estate. We all know that the one thing that remains constant in real estate is change itself and for those that won’t, can’t or don’t recognize the need to stay current will be left behind. Thanks for keeping us in the loop and in the fight.
Best Regards,
Derek Ahart
Dear Mark,
Thank you!
There are various appraiser’s forums, blogspots, and websites out there on which it is possible to read the namby-pamby whinings of a small but inexplicably vocal group of appraisers who, apparently, wish they could still fill out 1004 forms by pencil, make a copy of it, and then mail it to the client. These are the appraisers who want the rest of us to conclude, as do they, that anything less that a 1004 form is less than an appraisal. What is ironic is that the 1004 form is not an appraisal, never was, and the FHA (its designer) never intended it to be. It was the appraisal industry that concluded the form was the appraisal. In all candor, though, the lending industry abetted that thinking.
However, lest the blame not be spread around sufficiently, it is also clear that the major appraisal societies in the US invest very little time and money in educating their members that the 1004 form is not an appraisal, but merely one of many ways to report the results of the appraisal. The evidence for this conclusion is that this is what appraisers believe.
Even more lamentable are the thousands of appraisers, “educated” at the Billy-Bob Schools of Small Engine Repair and Real Estate Appraisal, who are taught to do nothing more than fill-in the blanks and squares of the 1004 form.
USPAP is clear that there are various ways to report the results of an appraisal to a client, yet still be in full compliance with Standard Two. Assuming the appraisal is not for a federally related transaction, all of the software vendors have forms more generic than the 1004 and, with the proper addenda and explnatory materials, these forms are fully USPAP compliant, even for depositions and expert witness work.
As to AVMs not applicable to residential appraising, that is claptrap. While clearly there are areas of the US in which there are too few sales data to populate an AVM, these are the clear exceptions. All of the arguments the anti-AVM crowd advances of why AVMs do not work demonstrate a hideous and willful ignorance of statistics and how that science works. Put 75 really comparable sales(i.e. appraiser-confirmed sales with the same H&BU as the subject)over the last five years on a scatter-plot, delete the obvious outlying sales, run these data thru a proper AVM program and the results will be as accurate as those of any appraiser and will be as bias-free as the data themselves.
But since the use of statistics requires the knowledge of long division (to quote Dr. Graaskamp), such an acceptance of statistics as teh basis for an appraisal is not likely to happen. This self-imposed impotence is what the industry should be up-in-arms about, not inconsequentials such as the HVCC and which appraisal form to use.
As to declining appraisal fees: yes, self-inflicted impotence and ignorance will do that.
Good luck in Arizona!
You have uncovered an awful truth most appraiser don’t want to hear. The purpose of appraisals is to provide guidance for clients. Be it lenders, investors, the general public etc. There should be a litany of products appraisers could use to fulfill the needs of the “customer”.
Instead many appraisers just start quoting USPAP and demand the client use a form 1004, 1073, 1025, full self-contained, summary narrative etc. Is it any wonder clients have gone elsewhere to fulfill there needs? We are like the used car salesman trying to sell the customer the green 4 door with a V8, when the customer is looking for a red 2 door with an inline 4.
I work at a bank and we do internal “evaluations” on our existing portfolio. But ask 5 people in appraising or banking and no one knows exactly what an evaluation is. For commercial and residential property, I have tried to compose what I think is a reasonable analysis of a property’s worth. Sales comps, listings, develop an NOI and cap rate were applicable. I note value trends, vacancy rates, rental rates etc. The values are noted as a range and I have labeled it an evaluation.
During our FDIC audit some of these reports have been reviewed by them and found to be sufficient to indicate a property’s approximate current market value.
And as you have noted, we need to develop valuation tools that meet our client’s needs for abbreviated valuation products. Fast and cheap is not a bad thing if it is done in a professional manner. Unfortunately most appraisers are too thick headed to realize they had better get on board with this trend. For it seems, the ship is leaving with or without them!
THANK YOU ! I have been having a hard time with ” EVALUATION ” orders for too long. Now Im ready to go!
Kudos Mr. Linné.
Once again, nail on the head.
We are so glad you are coming to our conference this Friday and Saturday (4/23 and 4/24). Appraisal incomes have been devastated by BPOs and other valuation methods. It isn’t just the 1004, it is the 1004 plus the 1004MC, plus the statistical pages, etc., etc. And it is not just the gathering of materials for our workfiles, it is the incredible amount of time it takes to type everything up.
It is time appraisers honestly faced and stated the facts. Some appraisals are easy and some are not. Some properties are in neighborhoods with a lot of comparables and some seem to have no comparables. According to USPAP it is up to the appraiser to determine the “scope of work”, perhaps that should also include the reporting form we should use. Perhaps in the sake of conformity and single pricing we have done ourselves in. I started a long time ago and there were fewer forms that took much less time. I find it hard to believe that the work I did then produced less accurate values than the ones I do with much more reporting (but not necessarily less research). To show you how important things seem to be at the time, but really are not, do you remember the PUD form? A page that took forever but in the long run went into the circular file.
There will be a lot of brainstorming at Friday’s and Saturday’s conference in Phoenix (www.azappraisersconference.com)and I am glad you are going to be there. I certainly don’t have all of the answers, but I surely want to listen to the questions and opinions of others.